The Crescent
Nursing Home · 11353 Sugar Park Lane, Sugar Land, TX 77478 · 2812762050
Scores by dimension
| Dimension | Score | Data confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Safety & compliance | 0.0 / 5 | high |
| Staffing | 2.3 / 5 | high |
| Clinical outcomes | 3.7 / 5 | high |
| Enforcement | 1.0 / 5 | high |
| Financial stability | 3.6 / 5 | med |
Key facts
| Care type | Nursing Home |
| Beds | 112 |
| Ownership | For Profit - Limited Liability Company |
| Operator | Sweeny Hospital District |
| Chain size | 38 facilities |
| Certified since | 2012-11-15 |
| CMS overall star | 2 / 5 |
| Accepts Medicaid | Yes |
| Price tier | $$$$$ of 5 · ~$502/day reported charge (within TX) |
Inspection & enforcement record
- Health-inspection citations: 7 immediate jeopardy · 0 actual harm · 35 potential for harm · 1 minor
- Federal fines: $107,221 · payment denials: 0 · penalty actions: 7
- On the CMS Special Focus Facility watch list.
Recent inspection findings
The 8 most recent health-inspection deficiencies on file with CMS, newest first. Severity is the CMS scope/severity scale (A–L); G and above mean actual harm or immediate jeopardy. "Corrected" shows the date the facility certified the fix.
| Date | Finding | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-26 | Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. (Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies, tag 0842) | D | corrected 2026-03-17 |
| 2026-02-13 | Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0686) | D | corrected 2026-03-17 |
| 2025-12-04 | Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. (Infection Control Deficiencies, tag 0880) | D | corrected 2025-12-05 |
| 2025-11-18 | Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0690) | E | corrected 2025-11-19 |
| 2025-11-18 | Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. (Infection Control Deficiencies, tag 0880) | D | corrected 2025-11-19 |
| 2025-10-23 | Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies, tag 0609) | D | corrected 2025-10-24 |
| 2025-10-23 | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0689) | J · immediate jeopardy | corrected 2025-10-24 |
| 2025-06-26 | Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies, tag 0600) | J · immediate jeopardy | corrected 2025-06-29 |
Staffing
Nurse hours per resident per day (CMS Payroll-Based Journal) — the strongest objective predictor of care. "Expected" is what CMS's case-mix model says this facility's resident acuity calls for.
- Total nurse staffing: 3.63 hrs/resident/day (expected 4.12 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected) (US median 3.69 · TX 3.27)
- Registered-nurse staffing: 0.66 hrs/resident/day (expected 0.72 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected) (US median 0.58)
- Breakdown: nurse aide 1.79 · LPN 1.19 hrs/resident/day
- Weekend total staffing: 3.17 hrs/resident/day (expected 3.66 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected)
- Annual nursing-staff turnover: 56.7% · RN turnover 52.6% (US median 45.3% · lower is better)
- Resident acuity (nursing case-mix index): 1.48 (1.0 ≈ national average; higher = more care-intensive residents)
Clinical outcomes — the measures behind the score
The 8 CMS MDS quality measures (2025Q1-2025Q4) driving this facility's clinical score — the same measures behind the CMS QM star. All are adverse-event rates: lower is better. Worst first. The quarterly column shows the four most recent quarters (Q1→Q4); benchmarks are the national percentile and the TX state median.
| Measure | 4-qtr avg | Quarterly (Q1→Q4) | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased (long stay) | 21.9% | 11.4 → 22.2 → 33.3 → 20 | worse than 81% of US homes · TX median 14.8% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (long stay) | 5.7% | 8.1 → 7.3 → 3.8 → 2.9 | worse than 67% of US homes · TX median 3.4% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury (long stay) | 2.3% | 1.7 → 1.8 → 3.8 → 2 | better than 60% of US homes · TX median 3% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened (long stay) | 11.4% | not reported | better than 60% of US homes · TX median 13% |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication (short stay) | 0.1% | 0.4 → 0 → 0 → 0 | better than 73% of US homes · TX median 0.7% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication (long stay) | 2.8% | 0 → 5.6 → 5.6 → 0 | better than 94% of US homes · TX median 8.1% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder (long stay) | 0% | 0 → 0 → 0 → 0 | better than 100% of US homes · TX median 0% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (long stay) | 0% | 0 → 0 → 0 → 0 | better than 100% of US homes · TX median 0.3% |
What this costs
- This facility's reported avg daily charge: $502/day · $$$$$ (price tier 5 of 5 among Texas nursing homes) — from its own federal cost report, FY ending 2024-11. Gross charges across all payers and services: higher than a quoted private rate, but computed identically for every facility, which makes the tier a fair within-state comparison.
- Payer mix (resident days): 39% Medicaid · 16% Medicare · 45% other/private · 86% occupancy
- Texas median (quoted rates): $185/day semi-private · $250/day private (national: $315 · $355)
- Accepts Medicaid: yes
- This facility's quoted rate: not public. This facility's quoted private rate isn't published by any federal or state source. Medicare covers short rehab stays (up to 100 days, copays after day 20); long-term stays are private pay until savings spend down to Medicaid. How to get the real number →
Market medians: CareScout Cost of Care Survey 2025 (collected July–November 2025), state-level — individual providers vary widely around a median. Facility-level prices aren't published by any government source; how to get a real quote.
Hospitals serving Fort Bend County
Hospitals in the same county — those with an emergency department first, then by CMS hospital star rating. Useful for transfers and emergencies.
| Hospital | City | ER | CMS star | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Methodist Sugarland Hospital | Sugar Land | Yes | 5★ | Acute care |
| Memorial Hermann Sugar Land Hospital | Sugar Land | Yes | 4★ | Acute care |
| Memorial Hermann Katy Hospital | Katy | Yes | 3★ | Acute care |
| Oakbend Medical Center | Richmond | Yes | 3★ | Acute care |
| St Luke's Sugar Land Hospital | Sugar Land | Yes | 3★ | Acute care |
| St Michaels Medical Hospital LLC | Sugar Land | Yes | — | Acute care |
Compare nearby
- A Paradigm At The Brazos · Richmond
- A- Spjst Rest Home No 2 · Needville
- B+ Oak Bend Medical Center · Richmond
- B- Fort Bend Healthcare Center · Rosenberg
- B- Richmond Health Care Center · Richmond
- B- Sugar Land Health Care Center · Sugar Land
Full interactive report card → Facility's own website ↗ CMS Care Compare ↗
Source: CMS Provider Information + Health Deficiencies + Penalties (as of 2026-05). Part of our Fort Bend County nursing homes coverage. Spot an error? Tell us.