Falcon Ridge Rehabilitation
Nursing Home · 149 Klattenhoff Lane, Hutto, TX 78634 · 5128407000
C+
graded on 75% of our rubric
Why you can trust this grade. HearthGrades is independent and free to use. Every grade is computed from public CMS and state records on a fixed, published rubric — safety inspections, staffing, clinical outcomes, enforcement and financial stability. This provider was graded on 75% of that rubric. No facility can pay to change its grade or where it appears, and we take no money from the providers we grade. See the full methodology.
Scores by dimension
| Dimension | Score | Data confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Safety & compliance | 3.0 / 5 | high |
| Staffing | 1.6 / 5 | high |
| Clinical outcomes | 3.3 / 5 | high |
| Enforcement | 2.9 / 5 | high |
| Financial stability | 3.3 / 5 | med |
Key facts
| Care type | Nursing Home |
| Beds | 140 |
| Ownership | For Profit - Corporation |
| Operator | South Limestone Hospital District |
| Chain size | 69 facilities |
| Certified since | 2015-04-02 |
| CMS overall star | 2 / 5 |
| Accepts Medicaid | Yes |
| Price tier | $$$$ of 5 · ~$366/day reported charge (within TX) |
Inspection & enforcement record
- Health-inspection citations: 1 immediate jeopardy · 1 actual harm · 30 potential for harm · 1 minor
- Federal fines: $60,135 · payment denials: 0 · penalty actions: 2
Recent inspection findings
The 8 most recent health-inspection deficiencies on file with CMS, newest first. Severity is the CMS scope/severity scale (A–L); G and above mean actual harm or immediate jeopardy. "Corrected" shows the date the facility certified the fix.
| Date | Finding | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-23 | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0689) | D | corrected 2025-11-17 |
| 2025-06-23 | Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist. (Pharmacy Service Deficiencies, tag 0755) | E | corrected 2025-06-24 |
| 2025-03-20 | Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. (Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies, tag 0656) | D | corrected 2025-03-28 |
| 2025-03-20 | Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. (Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies, tag 0812) | D | corrected 2025-03-28 |
| 2025-03-20 | Dispose of garbage and refuse properly. (Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies, tag 0814) | B | corrected 2025-03-28 |
| 2024-12-18 | Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. (Resident Rights Deficiencies, tag 0558) | D | corrected 2024-12-19 |
| 2024-12-18 | Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0686) | D | corrected 2024-12-19 |
| 2024-11-15 | Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable. (Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies, tag 0677) | E | corrected 2024-12-16 |
Staffing
Nurse hours per resident per day (CMS Payroll-Based Journal) — the strongest objective predictor of care. "Expected" is what CMS's case-mix model says this facility's resident acuity calls for.
- Total nurse staffing: 2.94 hrs/resident/day (expected 4.03 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected) (US median 3.69 · TX 3.27)
- Registered-nurse staffing: 0.20 hrs/resident/day (expected 0.71 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected) (US median 0.58)
- Breakdown: nurse aide 1.88 · LPN 0.87 hrs/resident/day
- Weekend total staffing: 2.67 hrs/resident/day (expected 3.58 for this facility's resident acuity — below expected)
- Annual nursing-staff turnover: 45.7% · RN turnover 55.6% (US median 45.3% · lower is better)
- Resident acuity (nursing case-mix index): 1.45 (1.0 ≈ national average; higher = more care-intensive residents)
Clinical outcomes — the measures behind the score
The 8 CMS MDS quality measures (2025Q1-2025Q4) driving this facility's clinical score — the same measures behind the CMS QM star. All are adverse-event rates: lower is better. Worst first. The quarterly column shows the four most recent quarters (Q1→Q4); benchmarks are the national percentile and the TX state median.
| Measure | 4-qtr avg | Quarterly (Q1→Q4) | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened (long stay) | 18.1% | not reported | worse than 66% of US homes · TX median 13% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased (long stay) | 17% | 19 → 10.2 → 20.3 → 18.2 | worse than 65% of US homes · TX median 14.8% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury (long stay) | 3% | 2.4 → 1.3 → 2.4 → 5.7 | worse than 52% of US homes · TX median 3% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder (long stay) | 0.2% | 0 → 0 → 0 → 0.8 | better than 58% of US homes · TX median 0% |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication (short stay) | 0.7% | 0 → 2.7 → 0 → 0 | better than 60% of US homes · TX median 0.7% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication (long stay) | 11% | 8.5 → 14.3 → 11.3 → 10.2 | better than 61% of US homes · TX median 8.1% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (long stay) | 0.3% | 0 → 0 → 1.2 → 0 | better than 72% of US homes · TX median 0.3% |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (long stay) | 1.4% | 0 → 1 → 1.6 → 2.8 | better than 91% of US homes · TX median 3.4% |
What this costs
- This facility's reported avg daily charge: $366/day · $$$$ (price tier 4 of 5 among Texas nursing homes) — from its own federal cost report, FY ending 2025-05. Gross charges across all payers and services: higher than a quoted private rate, but computed identically for every facility, which makes the tier a fair within-state comparison.
- Payer mix (resident days): 70% Medicaid · 4% Medicare · 26% other/private · 66% occupancy
- Texas median (quoted rates): $185/day semi-private · $250/day private (national: $315 · $355)
- Accepts Medicaid: yes
- This facility's quoted rate: not public. This facility's quoted private rate isn't published by any federal or state source. Medicare covers short rehab stays (up to 100 days, copays after day 20); long-term stays are private pay until savings spend down to Medicaid. How to get the real number →
Market medians: CareScout Cost of Care Survey 2025 (collected July–November 2025), state-level — individual providers vary widely around a median. Facility-level prices aren't published by any government source; how to get a real quote.
Hospitals serving Williamson County
Hospitals in the same county — those with an emergency department first, then by CMS hospital star rating. Useful for transfers and emergencies.
| Hospital | City | ER | CMS star | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascension Seton Williamson | Round Rock | Yes | 4★ | Acute care |
| Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Round Rock | Round Rock | Yes | 4★ | Acute care |
| Ascension Seton Cedar Park | Cedar Park | Yes | 3★ | Acute care |
| Round Rock Medical Center | Round Rock | Yes | 3★ | Acute care |
| Baylor Scott & White Medical Center -taylor | Taylor | Yes | — | Critical access |
| Texas Childrens Hospital North Austin Campus | Austin | Yes | — | Children's |
Compare nearby
- A- The Center At Parmer · Austin
- B+ Cedar Pointe Health And Wellness Center · Cedar Park
- B+ The Springs Healthcare And Rehabilitation · Cedar Park
- B Sagebrook Nursing And Rehabilitation · Cedar Park
- B Bel Air At Teravista · Round Rock
- B- New Hope Manor · Cedar Park
Full interactive report card → Facility's own website ↗ CMS Care Compare ↗
Source: CMS Provider Information + Health Deficiencies + Penalties (as of 2026-05). Part of our Williamson County nursing homes coverage. Spot an error? Tell us.